Development of the Atomic Model — Atomic Structure | Physics with Kate
Topic 02

🔮 Development of the Atomic Model 🔮

How our understanding of the atom evolved over centuries — from indivisible spheres to the model we use today.

✦ ✦ ✦

The Timeline

🎬

Key Principle

"New experimental evidence leads to a model being changed or replaced." — This is the nature of science. Each model was the best explanation at the time until new evidence showed it was incomplete.

Ancient Greece
Indivisible Spheres (Democritus)
Atoms were thought to be tiny, indivisible spheres — the smallest possible pieces of matter. No internal structure.
1897 — J.J. Thomson
The Plum Pudding Model
Thomson discovered the electron. His model: a ball of positive charge with electrons embedded throughout (like plums in a pudding). No nucleus.
1911 — Ernest Rutherford
The Nuclear Model
The alpha scattering experiment showed most of the atom is empty space with a tiny, dense, positively charged nucleus at the centre. Electrons orbit at a distance.
1913 — Niels Bohr
Energy Levels (Orbits)
Bohr refined the model: electrons orbit the nucleus in fixed energy levels (shells), not at random distances. This explained line spectra.
1919 — Rutherford
Discovery of the Proton
Rutherford identified the proton as a positively charged particle inside the nucleus.
1932 — James Chadwick
Discovery of the Neutron
Chadwick discovered the neutron — a neutral particle in the nucleus. This completed the model of the atom we use at GCSE.
✦ ✦ ✦

Rutherford's Alpha Scattering Experiment

🎬
Thomson's Plum Pudding Model (1897)
+ + + + + + + + + + + Electrons (−) Small, negatively charged, embedded Positive "pudding" Uniform sphere of positive charge No nucleus. No empty space.
Thomson's model: electrons scattered inside a uniform ball of positive charge — like plums in a pudding. This was the accepted model until Rutherford's experiment disproved it in 1911.
Rutherford's Alpha Scattering Experiment (1911)
+ α α α α MOST pass through
Evidence

Most alpha particles passed straight through the gold foil without being deflected.

Conclusion

The atom is mostly empty space.

+ α α SOME deflected
Evidence

Some alpha particles were deflected at small angles as they passed close to the nucleus.

Conclusion

The nucleus has a concentrated positive charge that repels the positive alpha particles.

+ α VERY FEW bounced back
Evidence

Very few alpha particles bounced straight back towards the source.

Conclusion

The nucleus is very small, very dense, and positively charged — enough to repel alpha particles head-on.

What Happened

Alpha particles were fired at thin gold foil. Three key observations:

  • Most alpha particles passed straight through → Most of the atom is empty space
  • Some were deflected at small angles → There is a positive charge in the centre (repelling the positive alpha particles)
  • Very few bounced straight back → The nucleus is very small, dense, and positively charged

Plum Pudding vs Nuclear Model — 4 Key Differences

  • Plum pudding has no nucleus — nuclear model has a small dense nucleus
  • Plum pudding has positive charge spread throughout — nuclear model has positive charge concentrated in the nucleus
  • Plum pudding has electrons embedded in the positive charge — nuclear model has electrons orbiting at a distance
  • Plum pudding has no empty space — nuclear model is mostly empty space
✦ ✦ ✦
Question 1 [4 marks] WORKSHEET
Describe four differences between the plum pudding model and the nuclear model of the atom.
Answer
1. Plum pudding has no nucleus; nuclear model has a small, dense nucleus [1]
2. Plum pudding: positive charge is spread evenly throughout; nuclear: positive charge is concentrated in the nucleus [1]
3. Plum pudding: electrons are embedded in the positive charge; nuclear: electrons orbit at a distance in energy levels [1]
4. Plum pudding: no empty space; nuclear model: mostly empty space [1]
Question 2 [4 marks] WORKSHEET
Explain how the results of the alpha scattering experiment led to the development of the nuclear model of the atom.
Answer
Most alpha particles passed straight through → the atom is mostly empty space [1]
Some were deflected at small angles → there is a concentration of positive charge in the centre (the nucleus repels the positive alpha particles) [1]
Very few bounced straight back → the nucleus is very small and very dense, with most of the atom's mass concentrated there [1]
This disproved the plum pudding model because if the positive charge were spread out evenly, alpha particles would never bounce back [1]
Question 3 [1 mark] WORKSHEET
In the alpha scattering experiment, alpha particles are fired at gold foil. Match the observation to the path of the alpha particle:

A) Continues undeflected   B) Deflected at an angle   C) Bounced straight back   D) Deflected upwards

Which path is taken by the majority of particles?
Answer
A — Continues undeflected, because most of the atom is empty space.
Question 4 [4 marks] AQA PAST PAPER
The model of the atom changed as new evidence was discovered. The plum pudding model suggested that the atom was a ball of positive charge with electrons embedded in it.

Evidence from the alpha particle scattering experiment led to a change in the model of the atom from the plum pudding model. Explain how.
AQA Mark Scheme
Most (alpha) particles passed (straight) through (the gold foil) [1]
(So) the mass of the atom is concentrated in the nucleus / centre OR most of the atom is empty space [1]
Some (alpha) particles were deflected / reflected [1]
(So) the atom has a (positively) charged nucleus / centre [1]
Question 5 [2 marks]
What key principle of science does the development of the atomic model demonstrate?
Answer
Scientific models are based on the best available evidence at the time [1]. When new experimental evidence is discovered that the current model cannot explain, the model is changed or replaced [1].
Question 6 [2 marks] PAST PAPER STYLE
Before Rutherford's experiment, the plum pudding model was the accepted model of the atom.

Explain why the results of the alpha scattering experiment could not be explained by the plum pudding model.
Answer
In the plum pudding model the positive charge is spread out evenly across the atom [1]. A spread-out positive charge would be too weak to cause alpha particles to bounce straight back — only a small, concentrated, dense positive nucleus could exert enough repulsive force to deflect them through large angles or backwards [1].
Question 7 [2 marks] AQA SPEC
Using the nuclear model, Rutherford devised an equation to predict the proportion of alpha particles that would be deflected through various angles. The results of the experiment were the same as the predictions made by Rutherford.

(a) Why did this experiment lead to a new model of the atom, replacing the plum pudding model? [1]
(b) Why is it important that the experimental results and the predictions are the same? [1]
Answer
(a) The experimental results of the alpha scattering experiment could not be explained using the plum pudding model (e.g. particles bouncing back), so a new model had to be developed that could explain the results [1]

(b) If the results match the predictions, it provides evidence that the model is correct / supports the theory. If the results do not match the predictions, the model must be changed or replaced [1]
Question 8 [4 marks] AQA PAST PAPER
The plum pudding model was replaced by the nuclear model. The nuclear model was developed after the alpha particle scattering experiment.

Compare the plum pudding model with the nuclear model of the atom.
AQA Mark Scheme (Level 2: 3–4 marks)
Similarities: Both have positive charges; both have (negative) electrons; neither has neutrons.

Differences:
• Plum pudding: ball of positive charge spread throughout → Nuclear: positive charge concentrated at the centre (nucleus) [1]
• Plum pudding: electrons embedded / spread throughout the positive charge → Nuclear: electrons outside the nucleus [1]
• Plum pudding: no empty space in the atom → Nuclear: most of the atom is empty space [1]
• Plum pudding: mass spread throughout → Nuclear: mass concentrated at the centre [1]
Question 9 [4 marks] IMAGE
The diagram below shows four models of the atom labelled A, B, C and D.

(a) Name each model (A, B, C and D). [2 marks]
(b) Put them in chronological order (earliest to latest). [2 marks]
+ n=1 n=2 A solid B + C + + + + + D
Answer
(a) Names:
A = Bohr model (energy levels / orbits) [½]
B = Dalton model (solid, indivisible sphere) [½]
C = Rutherford model (nuclear model) [½]
D = Thomson model (plum pudding model) [½]

(b) Chronological order:
B → D → C → A [2]
Dalton (ancient/early 1800s) → Thomson (1897) → Rutherford (1911) → Bohr (1913)
Question 10 [3 marks] IMAGE
The diagram below shows the paths of three alpha particles (labelled X, Y and Z) in Rutherford's alpha scattering experiment.

For each path, explain what it tells us about the structure of the atom.
Gold Foil + nucleus X straight through Y deflected Z bounced back α source detector
Answer
Path X — The alpha particle passes straight through the gold foil undeflected. This tells us that most of the atom is empty space [1].

Path Y — The alpha particle is deflected at a small angle as it passes close to the nucleus. This tells us that there is a concentration of positive charge in the centre of the atom (the nucleus) that repels the positively charged alpha particle [1].

Path Z — The alpha particle bounces straight back. This tells us that the nucleus is very small, very dense, and positively charged — dense enough and strongly charged enough to completely reverse the direction of the alpha particle [1].
✦ ✦ ✦

A Level - February

PHYSICS ONLY

16, 17, 18, 19 Feb 2026

Revision Course

GCSE - Easter

BIOLOGY, CHEMISTRY PHYSICS

7 - 10 April 2026

Revision Course

A Level & GCSE

PHYSICS ONLY

Term - Time

one to one

How You Can Work With Me

Support is offered in clear layers, so students and families can choose what fits best.

Free Community Access

A welcoming starting point with BRIDGE-based resources and introductory courses.

1:1 Specialist A-level Physics Support

Personalised teaching rooted in deep understanding, confidence, and exam success.

Small Group Programmes

Structured learning with motivated peers, focused on thinking, discussion, and application.

Physics With Kate

About Kate

I’m Kate — an experienced Physics teacher, examiner, and the founder of Physics with Kate.

Over more than 15 years, I’ve taught and examined thousands of students and seen first-hand how capable girls can lose confidence in Physics at A-level. I’ve also seen how quickly that changes when teaching focuses on understanding, courage, and belonging.

The BRIDGE Framework grew from real classrooms, real results, and a deep belief that girls belong in Physics — and can excel in it.

Ready to Build Confidence in Physics?

Whether you’re looking for structured support, a specialist tutor, or a community that truly understands A-level Physics, you’re in the right place do join my community or book in with me to find out more about I can support you, your department or your child.

A Community Where Girls Belong in Physics

The Physics with Kate Community is a supportive, academically focused space for girls studying A-level Physics.

Inside the community, students have access to:

  • Free BRIDGE-based mini courses

    • Brave and opened - Guided problem-solving sessions

    • Real understanding of the concepts

    • Insight by applying formulas and calculations to solve problems

    • Demonstrate understanding with exam technique support and revision resources

    • Growth, support with UCAS, extra-curricular competitions and projects and industry links

    • Example Visible sixth formers normalise girls in Physics for younger year groups

  • Free to join a network of like-minded girls who take Physics seriously

  • Subscriptions for 1:1 and group tutoring

This is a place where curiosity is encouraged, ambition is normalised, and girls feel confident to ask questions and think deeply.

"I believe a good education can take you anywhere on Earth and beyond" - Ellen Ochoa